First and foremost because GOG cannot handle their own CoC. Why did I say it would be a hypocritical move? Here, I'll explain it, maybe you will understand it - somehow I doubt it since you're looking in one direction only. And trust me, you don't want to go into semantics with me. Why go there just to annoy all their users and start fights? It is common sense. Personally when I don't agree with Epic for example and how they do things I don't go on their reddit every day to tell them that. We are talking about their own forums here that are made to support the store. So when you use the forums to follow your own agenda it is perfectly fine but if they decide to take actions against it suddenly they are hypocritical even though you say they are both not connected so it shouldn't matter. If boycotting has nothing to do with the forums then why call them hypocritical if they decide to lock this thread. Would you agree now atacking them fits perefctly since I also" understand facing criticism is not something easy" but that goes both ways you know. Criticize - "to express disapproval of someone or something" - same source. Haku_: Or maybe you should first check the dictionary what "atacking" means and then follow your own advice ? Here I'll help you with definition of atack - "to criticize someone strongly" - cambridge online dictionary. Still you call them hypocritical in advance if they would take any actions against this thread, regardless how far of the rails it would get? Untrue things are made up, it is getting more radical over time and the wall against the outside is getting bigger and bigger, while claiming to be in charge of a silent majority.Īnd while _every_ other store would have close this place down and maybe even kicked you out, GoG did not. In fact, just a small group of you is bumping it up.Īnd it does happend what usually will happend in this case. Most people don't even care about this topic. Should we talk about if this is hypocritical?Īnd the OP is already turning this thread into a political statement of his own, showing his own Cold War Red Dawn US-feelings very clearly. It was never intended, that GoG would be able to do enough to please him. There is no base for talking to each other. ![]() So he posted an ultimatum the other side can't follow at all and now they shall see his revenge. And it couldn't be low rated because people clearly see, that (differently then OP claimed) his post is not even close to be any kind of base for a discussion but a combination of many topics with some claims that that can't be fulfilled by GoG (removing the own game Gwent - what?) in any way. It happens a lot on this forum, as I'm sure youve noticed. Or maybe because some people just like to downvote. I just do it everywhere else.īasically it's low rated because people who exhibit the "the boycott is ridiculous and it will never work and it will ruin GOG and I will lose all my games because it won't work and I just love GOG so much" mindset tend to get very spiteful. ![]() Or maybe you should first check the dictionary what "atacking" means and then follow your own advice ? Here I'll help you with definition of atacking - "to criticize someone strongly" - cambridge online dictionary. Patrikc: Pointing out missteps is not the same as attacking, try to understand the difference before typing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |